Psychological measurement: Theory, paradoxes, and prototypes
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Paradoxes , Measurement - Disturbance and Contextuality
Many seemingly paradoxical effects are known in the predictions for outcomes of measurements made on preand post-selected quantum systems. A class of such effects, which we call “logical preand post-selection paradoxes”, bear a striking resemblance to proofs of the Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem, which suggests that they demonstrate the contextuality of quantum mechanics. Despite the apparent simi...
متن کاملSituated Behavior and the Place of Measurement in Psychological Theory
Measured values of human behavior may entail contradictory attributes of wave and particle by analogy with the wave/particle attributes of the electron. 1/f scaling is the wave attribute in this analogy and punctate data points are the particle attribute. One consequence of the wave/particle duality in physics was to elevate measurement to a primary place in physical theory, and one purpose of ...
متن کاملParadoxes and Violations of Normative Decision Theory
Traditional economic decision theory proposes that people behave in certain ways when faced with a well-formulated set of alternatives and information. It is a normative theory; it suggests that people should act according to certain decision rules, but not that they will necessarily do so in reality. The standard assumption is that a person has a utility function over all possible outcomes, wh...
متن کاملParadoxes in the Boltzmann kinetic theory
Paradoxes in the Boltzmann kinetic theory are presented. Firstly, it is pointed out that the usual notion concerning the perfect continuity of distribution function is not generally valid; in many important situations using certain types of discontinuous distribution functions is an absolute must. Secondly, it is revealed that there is no time reversibility in terms of beam-to-beam collisions a...
متن کاملGame Theory without Decision-Theoretic Paradoxes
Most work in game theory is conducted under the assumption that the players are expected utility maximizers. Expected utility is a very tractable decision model, but is prone to wellknown paradoxes and empirical violations (Allais 1953, Ellsberg 1961), which may induce biases in game-theoretic predictions. La Mura (2009) introduced a projective generalization of expected utility (PEU) which avo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Theory & Psychology
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0959-3543,1461-7447
DOI: 10.1177/0959354317699099